It's back to school time and American parents are looking for products to help their kids maximize achievement in the classroom. Unfortunately, as the Heritage Foundation's Dan Lips points out in the Philadelphia Inquirer, many never have a say in the most important variable in the education equation - the school their child will attend.
Adjusted for inflation, the US spends more per-pupil than ever, and here in New Jersey we spend more than anywhere else on planet Earth. Despite that, the U.S. ranks in the twenties among industrialized nations in math and science and one-fourth of all students never earn a high school diploma. The problem is even more pronounced in our urban centers, where poverty puts the greatest restrictions on where a parent can send their child to school.
Imagine how much stronger the American education system would be if families had greater control over the 100,000-plus tax dollars that are spent on their children's educations. Families could choose schools - just as they now shop for school supplies and backpacks - shopping for the right classroom that meets their children's unique needs.
For some, greater parental control might mean choosing to enroll their child in a different school, instead of the neighborhood public school. For others, it might mean supplementing their child's schooling with tutoring or extracurricular activities.
Across the nation, policymakers are slowly but surely giving parents more control over their children's education. Many states now offer families some choice in what kind of public school they send their children to. Additionally, 14 states and Washington, D.C., have programs to give more families the option of choosing between public and private schools for their children.
If all families had the power to choose the best school for their children, schools would work to attract them - showing why they offer a superior learning environment that meets children's specific needs. Struggling schools would face more pressure to turn themselves around, and the best schools would become models that are replicated across the country.
Here in New Jersey, a pilot program is sitting on the desks of legislators, awaiting an up-or-down vote. The UEZ Jobs Scholarship Act would, by its fifth year, allow up to 20,000 poor children in eight cities the opportunity to go to a school of their choosing - public or private. They would be tested in the same way as their peers in existing public school, and the legislature could then decide whether the program merits being extended. Even better news is that kids in the program would be educated at 40%-60% less than their peers in local public schools.
It's time for a fundamental change. If the US ranked in the twenties in the medal count in Beijing, there would be a national outcry. More money thrown into the same system has not produced better results. Just as it does in the private sector, genuine competition would. Just ask the residents of Milwaukee, Washington, Florida and elsewhere who have already voiced their support of existing school choice programs. Don't Jersey's kids and taxpayers deserve the same?